HUMAN‑MADE AI VISIBILITY REPORT · DELIVERED IN 72H
Your buyers now ask AI instead of Googling. AI answers cite a handful of sites — and ignore everyone else. We test 12 questions your buyers actually ask across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, show you who gets cited instead of you, and hand you fixes ranked by impact.
one page · no fluff · raw AI answers shown · human-reviewed
+527%
YoY growth in people asking AI
instead of searching
#1 ≠ cited
Google rank means nothing
inside ChatGPT answers
1 line
one line in a settings file is all it
takes to lock out every AI bot
How much is AI invisibility costing you per month? → Try the 15-second estimate
// the price tag
Same transparent math as inside your report. Edit your numbers — the model shows its work. This is a directional estimate, not a promise.
$ your numbers — edit these
| scenario | AI share* | gap | orders at risk / mo | revenue at risk / mo |
|---|
*AI-adoption share = fraction of purchase decisions that now start inside an AI assistant. Industry estimates for 2025–26 range single-digits to ~30% and climbing — no authoritative single number, so we show a range. Formula: monthly orders × AI share × gap ÷ 100 × AOV. Gap = competitor presence − yours, from live tests. Leading? Gap = 0 — you’re protecting, not losing.
Example defaults (20% vs 60%) illustrate a 40-point gap. Replace with your real numbers — your report measures them.
// live excerpt format
A real excerpt format from our reports. This site ranks #1 on Google for every one of these questions.
| buyer question | chatgpt | perplexity | gemini |
|---|---|---|---|
| best CRM for solo consultants? | MISS | MISS | #7/9 |
| top alternatives to HubSpot? | MISS | #5/8 | MISS |
| affordable invoicing tool for freelancers? | MISS | MISS | MISS |
| is [your brand] any good? | — never asked, because AI never mentions you — | ||
$ who_gets_cited --instead
G2.com appeared in 11 of 12 answers. One niche blogger appeared in 7. Your competitors aren't luckier — they're listed where AI looks.
$ root_cause --trace ✓ found
robots.txt:14 disallows GPTBot & PerplexityBot. Every MISS above traces back to this one line. Fix time: 2 minutes.
Your report won't look like this. It'll look worse before it looks better — that's why it's worth paying for.
// methodology · 5 layers
M1 25% Reachability (12 bots) · M2 30% Visibility (12 Q × N=3) · M3 20% Sources · M4 15% Citability (28 pts) · M5 10% Actionability — traceable to a line or a live answer.
// deliverables
12 real buyer questions × ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini: do you appear, where, in what tone. Like the table above — but for your site.
Which third-party sites dominate answers in your category, and what they have that you don't. This is where the work actually is.
Sites often accidentally slam the door on AI bots (a one-line settings file decides this) or bury their content where bots can't see it. We check yours line by line.
Every item written as “do this, expect that”. Ranked by impact. The first one is always doable today.
// positioning
Monitoring tools charge $29–$425/month to show you a score — and leave you staring at it. That's a subscription to bad news without a fix.
monitoring panels
citedo
Diagnose first, monitor later — subscribing to a dashboard while AI crawlers are blocked is paying rent on an empty house.
// audience
You depend on organic discovery but can't justify a $400/month enterprise platform. You want the two things worth fixing, not forty metrics.
Clients are asking “what about ChatGPT?” You need a credible answer you can forward — with evidence, not vibes.
Google sends fewer clicks every quarter as AI answers absorb queries. Find out if you exist in the new layer at all.
// process
Your URL and a rough idea of what customers would ask an AI. We help you phrase the 12 questions.
Every question run across three engines, twice, citations recorded. No black-box scores — actual answers.
Within 72 hours. Forwardable to your boss or client. Checked by a human before it reaches you.
// sample deliverable
An anonymized one-page report — same layout, same 6 chapters you receive. Traceable to robots.txt:14 or a live citation — see methodology. No email required for the preview.
Anonymized from a real audit. Private reports stay private — this preview is the only public one.
// free tools
Same checks as inside the report — just the slices you can run yourself.
TOOL 01 · 30s · server-side
Does your site block GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and 5 more? Tests robots.txt + live fetch.
Run check →
TOOL 02 · instant · in-browser
Paste any URL, get a 28-point content check in seconds. Structure + AI-readiness.
Score a page →
Every week unfixed is a week of buyers asking AI — and hearing about someone else.
// pricing
We'll reply within 24h with next steps and an invoice · every report delivered within 72h
A first honest look at where you stand.
$49
one-time
Everything in Standard, plus:
$99
one-time
Got it — we'll reply within 24 hours with next steps.
Free in exchange for two things: a testimonial if you find the report useful, and permission to show anonymized findings. No credit card.
Application received — we pick 3 sites monthly and email decisions.
// faq
Try it — that's genuinely the right first step. But one answer isn't data: LLMs are random, so you might get lucky once and conclude everything's fine. We run each question multiple times across three engines, record position and tone, map which sources get cited instead of you, and check the technical layer you can't see from the outside (is anything blocking the bots, does your site clearly say what it's about). Asking once tells you if; our report tells you why and what to do.
SEO tools track Google rankings. We test whether AI assistants mention you at all — a different surface with different rules. Several sites rank #1 on Google and are invisible in every AI answer; that gap is exactly what we diagnose.
Automated dashboards score you and leave you staring at a number. Every report here is crafted by a person who also reads the actual AI answers and tells you the story behind the score. Automation comes later; judgment comes first.
Yes — it's written for marketers and site owners, not engineers. Every fix is plain language (“remove these 2 lines from robots.txt”, “add an FAQ section answering X”), ordered by impact. If something does need a developer, we say exactly what to hand them.
No. Paid reports are private by default. Free reports may be shared in anonymized form only with your explicit OK.
Two cases, no questions asked: (1) the report is late — past 72 hours; (2) any technical finding doesn't match your actual setup — screenshot wins, we'll own the mistake. The value of the report is the live test data and the ranked fix list, so we don't make vague promises we can't objectively verify.
Fix the #1 item today, give AI engines 7–14 days to re-crawl, then re-test. We offer a $19 re-test that shows the before/after delta — most teams see movement in 2 weeks, not 2 days.
They are monitoring dashboards — great if you need daily tracking across 100+ prompts. We are a one-time diagnosis: 12–18 buyer questions run live on the actual engines (search-enabled endpoints), human-read, with a ranked fix list. Dashboards tell you if; we tell you why and what to do first. Start here, monitor later.
Often not. About half our #1 fixes are a 2-minute settings change — e.g. removing a line from robots.txt that blocks GPTBot. When code is needed, we write the exact snippet and where to paste it.
Yes. Our question engine supports EN/DE/FR buyer questions. Reports are delivered in English. If your market is non-English, tell us in the order form and we run that market's questions instead.